|
NIC Series Volume 21:
Measuring Synchronization in Model Systems and Electroencephalographic Time Series from Epilepsy Patients
Thomas Kreuz
ISBN 3-00-012373-3
February 2004, 138 pages
PDF
|
The main aim of this dissertation is the comparative investigation of
different measures of synchronization derived from various approaches
and concepts. These include both measures for estimating the degree of
dependence between two time series as well as measures which quantify
the directionality of this dependence. The first group comprises the
linear cross correlation, mutual information, six different indices for
phase synchronization (based either on the Hilbert or on the wavelet
transform) as well as symmetrized variants of two nonlinear
interdependence measures and of event synchronization. The
anti-symmetrized variants of the last three measures form the
group of measures of directionality.
In the first part of this dissertation the symmetric measures are tested
in a controlled setting by means of various model systems. Using the coupling
strength as a first control parameter it is investigated to which extent the
different measures are able to distinguish between different degrees of
dependence. Furthermore, the robustness of the measures against external
noise is estimated by varying the signal-to-noise ratio as the second
control parameter.
Subsequently, all measures are employed to analyze electroencephalographic
recordings from epilepsy patients. This application part consists of two
single studies. First a comprehensive comparison on the predictability of
epileptic seizures is carried out. Object of investigation is the
capability of the different measures to reliably distinguish between
the intervals preceding epileptic seizures and the intervals far away
from any seizure activity. Already in this study a great deal of
attention is paid to the statistical validation of seizure predictions.
This issue is particularly addressed in the last part of this dissertation
in which the method of measure profile surrogates is introduced as an
appropriate tool to distinguish between measures and algorithms unsuited
for the prediction of epileptic seizures, and more promising approaches.
Two of the measures of synchronization are used to illustrate this new approach.

|